Economic quantification of Loss and Damage funding needs (2024)

  • Comment
  • Published:

(2024)Cite this article

  • Metrics details

Subjects

  • Climate change
  • Climate-change impacts
  • Environmental economics

A loss and damage (L&D) fund has been established to support particularly vulnerable developing countries. L&D funding needs, entitlements and necessary contributions can be quantified using climate economics coupled with historical responsibility principles; for the year 2025, total L&D funding needs are estimated to be US $395 [128–937] billion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 /30days

cancel any time

Learn more

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

$99.00 per year

only $8.25 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Economic quantification of Loss and Damage funding needs (1)

References

  1. United Nations Environment Programme. Adaptation Gap Report 2023: Underfinanced. Underprepared. Inadequate investment and planning on climate adaptation leaves world exposed. (UN 2023). https://www.unep.org/resources/adaptation-gap-report-2023.

  2. Thomas, A. Research needs for loss and damage. Science 383, 798–798 (2024).

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Kotz, M., Wenz, L., Stechemesser, A., Kalkuhl, M. & Levermann, A. Day-to-day temperature variability reduces economic growth. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 319–325 (2021).

    Article Google Scholar

  4. Qian, C., Ye, Y., Chen, Y. & Zhai, P. An Updated Review of Event Attribution Approaches. J. Meteorol. Res. 36, 227–238 (2022).

    Article Google Scholar

  5. van der Geest, K. & van den Berg, R. Slow-onset events: a review of the evidence from the IPCC Special Reports on Land, Oceans and Cryosphere. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 50, 109–120 (2021).

    Article Google Scholar

  6. Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527, 235–239 (2015).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  7. Kalkuhl, M. & Wenz, L. The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 103, 102360 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  8. van der Wijst, K.-I. et al. New damage curves and multimodel analysis suggest lower optimal temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 434–441 (2023).

    Article Google Scholar

  9. Gazzotti, P. et al. Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies. Nat. Commun. 12, 3421 (2021).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  10. Piontek, F. et al. Integrated perspective on translating biophysical to economic impacts of climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 563–572 (2021).

    Article Google Scholar

  11. Hsiang, S. M. & Jina, A. S. The Causal Effect of Environmental Catastrophe on Long-Run Economic Growth: Evidence From 6,700 Cyclones (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014).

  12. Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Schinko, T., Surminski, S. & Linnerooth-Bayer, J. Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options (Springer Nature, 2019).

  13. Rising, J., Tedesco, M., Piontek, F. & Stainforth, D. A. The missing risks of climate change. Nature 610, 643–651 (2022).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  14. Bastien-Olvera, B. A. et al. Unequal climate impacts on global values of natural capital. Nature 625, 722–727 (2024).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.A. and M.C. acknowledge support from European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101056873 (ELEVATE). M.T. acknowledges funding from the European Union ERC Grant project No 101044703 (EUNICE). R.M. and T.D. acknowledge support from the Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Massimo Tavoni,Pietro Andreoni&Matteo Calcaterra

  2. RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment, Milan, Italy

    Massimo Tavoni,Pietro Andreoni&Matteo Calcaterra

  3. CMCC Foundation, Euro-Mediterranean Centre on Climate Change (CMCC), Milan, Italy

    Massimo Tavoni,Pietro Andreoni,Matteo Calcaterra&Elisa Calliari

  4. Systemic Risk and Resilience (SYRR/ASA) Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

    Elisa Calliari,Teresa Deubelli-Hwang,Reinhard Mechler&Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler

  5. Complexity Science department, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany

    Leonie Wenz

  6. Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC), Berlin, Germany

    Leonie Wenz

Authors

  1. Massimo Tavoni

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Pietro Andreoni

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. Matteo Calcaterra

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  4. Elisa Calliari

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  5. Teresa Deubelli-Hwang

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  6. Reinhard Mechler

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  7. Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  8. Leonie Wenz

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

M.T. conceived the article. M.T. and P.A. developed the model for quantifying L&D. All authors reviewed the literature and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Tavoni.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks Melanie Pill, Zoha Shawoo, Joyce Kimutai, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Economic quantification of Loss and Damage funding needs (2)

Cite this article

Tavoni, M., Andreoni, P., Calcaterra, M. et al. Economic quantification of Loss and Damage funding needs. Nat Rev Earth Environ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00565-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00565-7

Economic quantification of Loss and Damage funding needs (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Golda Nolan II

Last Updated:

Views: 5915

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Golda Nolan II

Birthday: 1998-05-14

Address: Suite 369 9754 Roberts Pines, West Benitaburgh, NM 69180-7958

Phone: +522993866487

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Shopping, Quilting, Cooking, Homebrewing, Leather crafting, Pet

Introduction: My name is Golda Nolan II, I am a thoughtful, clever, cute, jolly, brave, powerful, splendid person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.